Letter from Angus Graham to Hi'dé Ishiguro to thank for his letter and to respond to Ishiguro's critique.

Letter from Ted [Honderick], Department of Philosophy, University College, London, to Angus Graham to tell Graham that he is unable to comment on Graham's manuscript. He suggests some reading that may be helpful for Graham.

Letter from Richard Hare to Angus Graham to thank Graham for sending his paper but regrets lack of time prevents great comment.

Letter from Peter Wrinch, Department of Philosophy, King's College, London, to Angus Graham to return his article, Value, fact and facing fact with his handwritten comments. The article is with the letter.

Letter from Angus Graham to Richard Hare to respond to the one criticism that Hare had presented in his letter.

Letter from Richard Hare to Angus Graham to respond to Graham's letter and put forward his own point.

Letter from Norman [Girardot] to Angus Graham to state that Graham's paper might be of interest to current philosophy but that he is not sufficiently acquainted with the subject. He suggests potential journal for publications.

Letter from Christoph [Harbsmeier] to Angus Graham to respond with some comments to the article that Graham has sent.

Letter from Arthur Danto, Columbia University, to Angus Graham in which he apologises for the delay in responding to Graham's article but he has been travelling for the last month. He then comments upon Graham's paper.

Letter from Angus Graham to Arthur Danto to thank for his letter on Value, fact and facing fact. Graham expresses his disappointment that Danto has only provided stock answers.