Letter from Herbert Fingarette to Angus Graham to thank him for sending material on a new work in progress. He remarks on Graham's generosity towards Fingarette's own work on Confucius and how this new work sent adds into their previous discourse regarding Reason and Spontaneity.
Sem títuloPhilosophy
242 Descrição arquivística resultados para Philosophy
Letter from V.V. Nalimov, Moscow State University, to Angus Graham to discuss the premises within Reason and Spontaneity and how his own premises differ.
Sem títuloLetter from Angus Graham to V.V. Nalimov to thank for his letter and to continue the discussion regarding the premises in Graham's book. Incomplete.
Sem títuloLetter from Joel Kupperman, University of Connecticut, to Angus Graham to thank Graham for sending a copy of Reason and Spontaneity.
Sem títuloLetter from J.F. Standish, Curzon Press, to Angus Graham concerning his proposal to publish a paperback version of Reason and Spontaneity and the potential problems thereof.
Sem títuloLetter from Angus Graham to Henry Rosemont concerning the republication of Reason and Spontaneity and their debate over fundamental issues. With the letter is a draft concerning Rosemont's review of Reason and Spontaneity.
Sem títuloLetter from J.F. Standish, Curzon Press, to Angus Graham to inform him regarding the position of his hardback edition of Reason and Spontaneity and therefore the problems of bringing out a paperback. He encloses a letter he has received from Barnes & Noble, the American arm of the original publication.
Sem títuloLetter from Joel Kupperman, Department of Philosophy, University of Connecticut, to Angus Graham to express his pleasure in seeing Graham in Hawaii and to give some thoughts on the interpretative character of awareness.
Sem títuloLetter from Angus Graham to Joel Kupperman to continue the discussion on awareness and points from the book.
Sem títuloLetter from Joel Kupperman, Department of Philosophy, University of Connecticut, to Angus Graham to try again to formulate what he believes is Graham's vulnerable point in the argument.
Sem título