Affichage de 9389 résultats

Letter from Peter Wrinch, Department of Philosophy, King's College, London, to Angus Graham to return his article, Value, fact and facing fact with his handwritten comments. The article is with the letter.

Letter from Angus Graham to Richard Hare to respond to the one criticism that Hare had presented in his letter.

Letter from Richard Hare to Angus Graham to respond to Graham's letter and put forward his own point.

Letter from Norman [Girardot] to Angus Graham to state that Graham's paper might be of interest to current philosophy but that he is not sufficiently acquainted with the subject. He suggests potential journal for publications.

Letter from Christoph [Harbsmeier] to Angus Graham to respond with some comments to the article that Graham has sent.

Letter from Arthur Danto, Columbia University, to Angus Graham in which he apologises for the delay in responding to Graham's article but he has been travelling for the last month. He then comments upon Graham's paper.

Letter from Angus Graham to Arthur Danto to thank for his letter on Value, fact and facing fact. Graham expresses his disappointment that Danto has only provided stock answers.

Letter from Alastair Hannay, Inquiry, to Christoph Harbsmeier to inform that the article is not suitable for Inquiry. Added to the letter is a note to Graham to apologise for the delay.

Letter from Alastair Hannay, Inquiry, to Angus Graham to state that they would be unable to publish Graham's article Value, Fact and Facing Fact.

Letter from James B. Wilbur, Executive Editor, The Journal of Value Enquiry to Angus Graham to inform Graham that the Editors have read his paper, Value, Fact and facing Fact, and wish to publish it in 1984 in Volume 18.