Letter from J.F. Standish, Curzon Press, to Angus Graham to inform Graham of further progress with preparing the book.
Sans titreLetter from J.F. Standish, Curzon Press, to Angus Graham to inform Graham that the book was now with Maygars, as Graham had requested.
Sans titreLetter from J.F. Standish, Curzon Press, to Angus Graham to state that a set of galley proofs had been sent to Graham under separate cover. With the letter is Curzon Press' "Symbols for Use in the Correction of Proofs".
Sans titreLetter from Pek Siong Ching, The Institute of East Asian Philosophies, to The Editor, Curzon Press, to ask that the Institute be associated with Graham's Reason and Spontaneity. With her letter is a letter from Graham stating he has no objection to this.
Sans titreLetter from J.F. Standish, Curzon Press, to Angus Graham to state that his proofs had not yet arrived. He sends galley slip 125 and ask Graham to check this.
Sans titreLetter from J.F. Standish, Curzon Press, to Mrs Pek Siok Ching, Institute of East Asian Philosophies, to agree that the name of the Institute can be shown somewhere on Graham's book. With this letter is a copy of the reply sent by Pek Siok Ching regarding the status of the Institute and the request for the Institute to be acknowledged in Graham's book, dated 12 October 1984.
Sans titreLetter from J.F. Standish, Curzon Press, to Angus Graham to state that the galley proofs have arrived and to say they will add Graham's credentials to the jacket.
Sans titreLetter from J.F. Standish, Curzon Press, to Angus Graham to send page proofs of the book and to ask him to return corrections via airmail.
Sans titreLetter from J.F. Standish, Curzon Press, to Angus Graham to state that Graham's corrected page proofs have arrived but the package had burst open and there was no covering letter. With the letter is a "Guide for Authors".
Sans titreLetter from J.F. Standish, Curzon Press, to Angus Graham to discuss the process of typesetting and typesetters. He also states that he has received a copy of Graham's review of Harbsmeier's Aspects of Classical Chinese and explains the reasons for the mistakes found in this publication.
Sans titre